A Closer Look at Physical Intimacy

Although physical intimacy is one of the most natural aspects of relationships, it remains one of the topics we find most difficult to discuss. More research is being conducted on sexuality than ever before, and more content is being produced; yet, conversations about it remain quite limited. Perhaps that is why rigid stereotypes about how sexuality “should be” can overshadow real-life experiences. At the same time, scientific research has fundamentally changed the way we understand human sexuality. Over the past several decades, researchers have moved beyond asking what a “normal” sexual response should look like and have instead focused on understanding the many ways people experience desire, arousal, intimacy, and satisfaction. In this therapy sketch, we’ll explore some of the most influential theories and research findings that have shaped our current understanding of human sexuality.

Sexuality and Theories

Theories of the sexual response cycle help us understand common patterns observed in human sexuality and develop approaches that support people in having more satisfying sexual experiences. However, each person’s sexuality and thus their sexual response process is unique. For this reason, no single model can fully explain everyone’s experience.

Model of Masters and Johnson

The foundations of the sexual response cycle as we know it today were laid by pioneering research conducted in the 1950s and 1960s. Until that time, sexuality had been explained largely through theoretical approaches or clinical observations; however, William Masters and Virginia Johnson conducted the first systematic studies to examine the human sexual response physiologically in a laboratory setting (Masters & Johnson, 1966). Their work enabled them to develop the Sexual Response Cycle model by identifying the changes that occur in the body during sexual arousal. This model, consisting of four stages:

Arousal: This is the stage in which the body and mind begin to prepare for sexual activity in response to sexual stimulation. Heart rate and breathing quicken, muscle tension increases, blood flow to the genital area increases, and physical arousal begins to become noticeable. The duration of this stage can vary from person to person and is influenced by emotional and cognitive factors as well as physical ones.
Plateau: The plateau phase is the period during which arousal continues and intensifies. Masters and Johnson defined this phase as the peak level of arousal immediately preceding orgasm. Although it was initially thought that arousal remained constant during this phase, later studies have shown that both physiological and psychological arousal actually continue to increase.
Orgasm: It is defined as the most intense physiological phase of the sexual response. During this phase, involuntary rhythmic contractions occur, an intense sensation of pleasure is experienced, and accumulated sexual tension is released quickly. However, the way an orgasm is experienced, its duration, and its intensity can vary significantly from person to person.
Resolution: The recovery phase is the stage during which the body gradually returns to a resting state. Heart rate, breathing, and muscle tension return to normal (Masters & Johnson, 1966).

This model marked a significant turning point in the scientific understanding of sexuality. Although Masters and Johnson’s model was revolutionary in the field of sexuality research, studies conducted in subsequent years showed that sexual response does not always follow this linear sequence. In particular, once it became clear that desire, emotional intimacy, and relationship dynamics were also important determinants of the sexual experience, more flexible and contextual models began to be developed.

Kaplan’s Model

Psychiatrist and sex therapist Helen Singer Kaplan made a significant contribution to the model in the 1970s by adding the “desire” phase to the beginning of the cycle.

Kaplan defined sexual desire not merely as a biological drive, but as a cognitive and emotional motivation to seek sexual arousal, show interest in sexual stimuli, and respond to these stimuli. According to this view, a person first experiences this subjective desire, then physiological arousal develops, and the process continues with orgasm. In this regard, Kaplan has distinguished the model from approaches that explain the sexual response solely through physical changes by placing psychological processes at the center of the model.

Thus, Kaplan’s three-stage model was restructured to include desire, arousal, and orgasm. This approach emphasized that sexuality is not merely a physiological event but also a psychological experience influenced by cognitive and emotional processes, bringing about a significant shift, particularly in the understanding and treatment of sexual desire disorders.

However, Kaplan also argued that the sexual response follows a linear progression. In other words, he believed that desire arises first, followed by arousal and orgasm. Studies conducted in subsequent years, however, showed that this sequence does not always hold true for many people; sometimes arousal can precede desire, and at other times, emotional intimacy can trigger sexual desire later on. These findings prepared the ground for the development of more flexible and relationship-oriented models (Kaplan, 1979).

Basson’s Sexual Response Cycle

The models proposed by Masters and Johnson and Kaplan assume that the sexual response proceeds in a specific sequence: first desire, then arousal, and finally orgasm. However, clinical observations and subsequent research have shown that this sequence does not fully reflect reality for many people.

Based on these observations, Rosemary Basson defined the sexual response not as a linear process, but as a cyclical and multidimensional one. According to Basson, a person does not always initiate sexual intimacy by feeling a strong sexual desire. Sometimes the process may begin with a desire to be close to a partner, to show affection, to hug, to kiss, or to spend quality time together. The arousal that develops during this physical and emotional closeness may, over time, lead to the emergence of sexual desire. In other words, in this model, desire does not have to be a prerequisite for arousal; sometimes it can develop as a natural consequence of arousal (Basson, 2001 & Basson, 2015).

One of the most significant contributions of Basson’s model is its emphasis on the fact that sexuality is not merely a biological process but a dynamic experience constantly influenced by relational, emotional, cognitive, and contextual factors. Trust in a partner, the quality of the relationship, stress levels, body image, life events, and past experiences can all influence every stage of the cycle. For this reason, even the same person may experience sexuality differently at various stages of their life (Basson, 2001 & Basson, 2015).

Another important difference is that the model focuses on sexual satisfaction rather than orgasm as the ultimate goal. According to Basson, not every sexual experience needs to end in orgasm; nevertheless, a person can still derive satisfaction from the encounter. Sexual satisfaction can mean different things for every couple. For some, this feeling is associated with intense physical pleasure and relaxation, while for others, the emotional closeness with their partner, feeling understood, or being able to form a bond is much more important. Therefore, the “success” of a sexual experience should be evaluated not solely by whether an orgasm occurs, but by how satisfied the individual and the couple are with the experience (Basson, 2001 & Basson, 2015).

What does neuroscience say?

Recent neuroimaging studies show that sexual response is not controlled by a single “sexual center” in the brain; rather, it arises from the coordinated activity of many brain regions with different functions. While sexual stimuli are initially processed in the visual and sensory cortices, the amygdala and ventral striatum (particularly the nucleus accumbens) assess whether the stimulus is rewarding. These regions play a key role in the development of sexual desire, motivation, and reward anticipation (Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012; Berridge & Kringelbach, 2015).

Ventral striatum (Nucleus Accumbens): Desire, motivation, and reward anticipation.
Amygdala: Assessment of the importance and emotional value of sexual stimuli.
Hypothalamus: Regulation of hormonal and autonomic physiological responses.
Insula: Perception of bodily sensations and the subjective feeling of arousal.
Orbitofrontal cortex: Pleasure, reward evaluation, and the interpretation of experience.
Cerebellum and motor cortex: Coordination of rhythmic contractions during orgasm.

To sum up, the brain plays a central role in initiating, sustaining, and making sense of sexual experiences.

Also, brain imaging studies show that sexual response does not function entirely differently from other pleasurable experiences. The brain networks active during sexual experiences largely overlap with the reward systems activated when we eat, listen to music we love, hug someone, or engage in romantic intimacy. For this reason, sexuality is not merely a biological behavior serving reproduction; it is also viewed as a fundamental human experience associated with reward, bonding, and a sense of intimacy.

Current models converge precisely on this point. Sexual response is a multilayered process in which hormones, the body, thoughts, emotions, past experiences, and relationship dynamics constantly influence one another. Therefore, rather than speaking of a single sexual response cycle that applies to everyone, it is more accurate to discuss different patterns of sexual response that are based on common biological mechanisms but shaped by personal experiences.

Clinical Meanings

Basson’s model and neuroscientific studies have made significant contributions to changing our perspective on sexuality. The core message is that not every sexual experience needs to begin the same way. Also, while a lack of spontaneous desire was previously often assessed as a sexual dysfunction, new models demonstrate that this difference is not always pathological. Particularly in long-term relationships, a person’s lack of intense sexual desire at the outset and the emergence of desire through a secure bond, a supportive environment, physical intimacy, and arousal can be a completely healthy and expected sexual pattern. Another clinical takeaway is that these approaches reduce the risk of labeling differences as dysfunction. This is because not everyone’s sexual response cycle is the same, and each individual’s “normal” experience can manifest in different ways ( Basson, 2015). When assessing sexual health, the goal is not to make a person fit a specific model, but to understand their own sexual experience and relational context.

Take aways

Sexual response is unique, and no single model explains everyone’s experience.
Sexuality is a dynamic process influenced by biological, psychological, relational, and contextual factors.
Desire does not always precede arousal; it can emerge through emotional and physical intimacy.
The brain initiates, sustains, and gives meaning to sexuality through interconnected neural networks.
The goal is to understand an individual’s sexual experience and relational context, not to fit them into a single model.

References:

Basson, R. (2015). Human sexual response. In D. B. Vodušek & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. 130, pp. 11–18). Elsevier.
Basson, R. (2001). Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27(5), 395–403.
Georgiadis, J. R., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2012). The human sexual response cycle: Brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.004
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron, 86(3), 646–664.
Kaplan, H. S. (1979). Disorders of Sexual Desire and Other New Concepts and Techniques in Sex Therapy. Brunner/Mazel.
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human Sexual Response. Little, Brown and Company.

Book Now

Find a Specialist

At Roamers Therapy, our psychotherapists are here to support you through anxiety, depression, trauma and relationship issues, race-ethnicity issues, LGBTQIA+ issues, ADHD, Autism, or any challenges you encounter. Our psychotherapists are trained in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, Psychodynamic Therapy, Acceptance, and Commitment Therapy, Person-Centered Therapy, and Gottman Therapy.

Whether you’re seeking guidance on a specific issue or need help navigating difficult emotions, we’re ready to assist you every step of the way.

Contact us today to learn more about our services and schedule a session with our mental health professionals to begin your healing journey. To get started with therapy, visit our booking page.

First, decide if you’ll be paying out-of-pocket or using insurance. If you’re a self-pay client, you can book directly through the “Book Now” page or fill out the “Self-Pay/Out-of-network Inquiry Form.” If you’re using insurance, fill out the “Insurance Verification Form” to receive details about your costs and availability. Please let us know your preferred therapist. If your preferred therapist isn’t available, you can join the waitlist by emailing us. Once your appointment is confirmed, you’ll receive intake documents to complete before your first session.

This page is also part of the Roamers Therapy Glossary; a collection of mental-health related definitions that are written by our therapists.

While our offices are currently located at the South Loop neighborhood of Downtown Chicago and Lakeview on Chicago’s North Side, Illinois, we also welcome and serve clients for online therapy from anywhere in Illinois and Washington, D.C. Clients from the Chicagoland area may choose in-office or online therapy and usually commute from surrounding areas such as River North, West Loop, Gold Coast, Old Town, Lincoln Park, Rogers Park, Logan Square, Pilsen, Bridgeport, Little Village, Bronzeville, South Shore, Hyde Park, Back of the Yards, Wicker Park, Bucktown and many more. You can visit our contact page to access detailed information on our office location.